Here, Philip Bobbitt studies the basis for the legitimacy of judicial review by examining six types of constitutional argument--historical, textual, structural, prudential doctrinal, and ethical--through the unusual method o...

Buy Now From Amazon

Product Review

Here, Philip Bobbitt studies the basis for the legitimacy of judicial review by examining six types of constitutional argument--historical, textual, structural, prudential doctrinal, and ethical--through the unusual method of contrasting sketches of prominent legal figures responding to the constitutional crises of their day.


Similar Products

We the People, Volume 1: Foundations (We the People (Harvard))Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Harvard Paperbacks)Civil Procedure: Doctrine, Practice, and Content [Connected Casebook] (Aspen Casebook)Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: 2016-2017 Statutory Supplement with Resources for Study (Supplements)Tort Law and Alternatives: Cases and Materials (University Casebook Series)Civil Procedure, 7th Edition (Examples & Explanations)Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and MaterialsThe Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of PoliticsAmerica's Constitution: A BiographyImpeachment: A Handbook (Yale Fastback Series)