In Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform, Jamie L. Carson and Jason M. Roberts present an original study of U.S. congressional elections and electoral institutions for 1872-1944 from a contemporar...

Buy Now From Amazon

Product Review

In Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform, Jamie L. Carson and Jason M. Roberts present an original study of U.S. congressional elections and electoral institutions for 1872-1944 from a contemporary political science perspective. Using data on late nineteenth and early twentieth century congressional elections, the authors test the applicability in a historical context of modern political science theories, assess the effects of institutional reforms, and identify the factors that shape the competitiveness of elections. They present several key findings: the strategic politicians theory is applicable in an era without candidate-centered campaigns; there was an incumbency advantage prior to the full development of candidate-centered campaigns; institutional reforms have had a significant effect on elections; and the degree of electoral competition frequently correlates with elected officials' responsiveness to citizens.



Similar Products

The Voting Wars: From Florida 2000 to the Next Election MeltdownThe Development of the American PresidencyStealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work (Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology)Governing States and LocalitiesGet Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout, 2nd EditionThe Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential ElectionCongress and Its MembersThe Original Compromise: What the Constitution's Framers Were Really ThinkingWhite Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America