Scholars of the U.S. House disagree over the importance of political parties in organizing the legislative process. On the one hand, non-partisan theories stress how congressional organization serves members' non-partisan go...

Buy Now From Amazon

Product Review

Scholars of the U.S. House disagree over the importance of political parties in organizing the legislative process. On the one hand, non-partisan theories stress how congressional organization serves members' non-partisan goals. On the other hand, partisan theories argue that the House is organized to serve the collective interests of the majority party. This book advances a partisan theory and presents a series of empirical tests of that theory's predictions (pitted against others). The evidence demonstrates that the majority party seizes agenda control at nearly every stage of the legislative process in order to prevent bills that the party dislikes from reaching the floor.

Similar Products

Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. LawmakingCongress: The Electoral Connection, Second EditionDivided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-2002, Second EditionDemocracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government (Princeton Studies in Political Behavior)Information and Legislative Organization (Michigan Studies in Political Analysis)The Logic of Congressional ActionWhy Parties?: A Second Look (Chicago Studies in American Politics)The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Second printing with new preface and appendix (Harvard Economic Studies)Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions)The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology)