All lineages of Tibetan Buddhism today claim allegiance to the philosophy of the Middle Way, the exposition of emptiness propounded by the second-century Indian master Nagarjuna. But not everyone interprets it the same way. ...

Buy Now From Amazon

Product Review

All lineages of Tibetan Buddhism today claim allegiance to the philosophy of the Middle Way, the exposition of emptiness propounded by the second-century Indian master Nagarjuna. But not everyone interprets it the same way. A major faultline runs through Tibetan Buddhism around the interpretation of what are called the two truths--the deceptive truth of conventional appearances and the ultimate truth of emptiness. An understanding of this faultline illuminates the beliefs that separate the Gelug descendents of Tsongkhapa from contemporary Dzogchen and Mahamudra adherents. The Two Truths Debate digs into the debate of how the two truths are defined and how they are related by looking at two figures, one on either side of the faultline, and shows how their philosophical positions have dramatic implications for how one approaches Buddhist practice and how one understands enlightenment itself.

Similar Products

Appearance and Reality: The Two Truths in the Four Buddhist Tenet SystemsMadhyamaka and Yogacara: Allies or Rivals?Meditation on EmptinessThe Svatantrika-Prasangika Distinction: What Difference Does a Difference Make?Introduction To Emptiness: As Taught In Tsong-Kha-Pa's Great Treatise On The Stages Of The PathIntroduction to the Middle Way: Chandrakirti's Madhyamakavatara with Commentary by Ju MiphamNagarjuna's Middle Way: Mulamadhyamakakarika (Classics of Indian Buddhism)Deity Yoga: In Action and Performance Tantra (Wisdom of Tibet Series)Recognizing Reality: Dharmakirti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations (Suny Series in Buddhist Studies) (Suny Series, Buddhist Studies)Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction